[SQL-Ledger] Re: SL and related vs QB

[Armaghan Saqib]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Michael Hasse <inquiries at itwerx.net> wrote:
>I had originally intended the message below for Armaghan alone but inadvertently sent it as a reply to a (wrong) address for the mailing list.  In the conversation around the resulting error Armaghan requested that I go ahead and send it to the correct list address.  I don't know the reasoning but all possibilities I can think of are probably positive in the long run, so here it is.

Thanks Michael,

Of course positive. We do need criticism as it helps us make things better.

SQL-Ledger has a lot of pain points/gotchas. With community help and
support, I am hoping to get rid of all these issues in 2010. Which
also means that there will be little focus on adding new features.

> Oh, the irony!
>  Our new CFO convinced us to re-examine QuickBooks and it has leapfrogged way past the SL contingent in the last couple of years, (we just finished switching).

I have never used quickbooks so not qualified to make the comparison.
But I do think the comparison is of little use if SQL-Ledger is
serving your needs (or not as in your case).

>  Best of luck though, and who knows, we might be switching back in another few years!  :)

I do hope and you can always recommend it to other people.

Regards
Armaghan